The Gun Control Fallacy

Gun control to put it simply, is impossible. It is impossible because it is not an attempt to control guns, but is an attempt to control human behavior. Would it be possible to implement car or knife control? Human behavior dictates whether or not there will be a school shooting, not laws. Laws can only provide for punish for the crime, not prevent it. Do speed limit signs prevent speeding.

The looney Left never miss an opportunity to take advantage of the deaths of selected individuals, school children in this case, to advance a political agenda while using their favorite tools which in this case happens to be school children. The tactic of using and indoctrinating children is a mainstay of Liberal political philosophy. Just as it is with communists, fascists, socialists, and nazis.

These cries from the Left and the ignorant children they have incorporated into their agenda are not about actually protecting the children. How do we know this? It’s simple. When it is proposed to protect children while at school with armed personnel in some fashion, Liberals are unalterably opposed to it. They make stupid emotional arguments such as that schools shouldn’t be like armed fortresses or some such, or that it will be emotionally traumatic to the children. These fallacious arguments are exhibit one that they couldn’t care less about protecting the children, but are more interested in restricting, then reducing, to be followed by eliminating gun ownership rights.

Don’t think for one moment that just because the Constitution protects gun ownership that it is a right that cannot be taken away by usurpation. The Federal government has no Constitutional authority to make us buy anything, but the Supreme Court said it does have the authority to make us buy health insurance. Obamacare is unconstitutional which means that this ruling by the Supreme Court was itself unconstitutional. The Constitution is merely a collection of words protected by the goodwill of men, and don’t count on that goodwill.

The only way to protect children at school is with armed personnel and those who can be armed at a moment’s notice, a school militia of sorts, how ironic. The banning of bump stocks, age requirements, and high capacity magazine restrictions will do absolutely nothing to protect children at the point of attack. There are ways to very easily overcome all of these useless laws in order to inflict as many casualties as possible. We live in a different world now. Disaffected former students and jilted boyfriends are not the only threat out there. No law can protect the school children from your run-of-the-mill terrorists. What then? Will Liberals squeal about terrorist control? Yes, we must protect the children, but it is clear we can’t count on Liberals to cooperate in that endeavor.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.